JF "A" Frame FEA
This report documents
design and analysis information created and maintained using
the ANSYS DesignSpace® engineering software program. Each
scenario listed below represents one complete engineering
simulation.
Scenario 1
"A"
Frame TIS Loading = Real Load * 1.5 = 195t
Based on the ACIS® part
"A_frame_3.sat".
Considered the effect of
structural loads.
Calculated safety factors
and margins based on maximum equivalent stress along with
structural and frequency results.
No convergence criteria
defined.
No alert criteria defined.
See
Scenario 1 below for supporting details.
Scenario 2
"A" Frame Real
Loading 130t
Based on the ACIS® part
"A_frame_3.sat".
Considered the effect of
structural loads.
Calculated safety factors
and margins based on maximum equivalent stress along with
structural and frequency results.
No convergence criteria
defined.
No alert criteria defined.
See
Scenario 2 below for supporting details.
Scenario 3
"A" Frame Test
Loading 250t
Based on the ACIS® part
"A_frame_3.sat".
Considered the effect of
structural loads.
Calculated safety factors
and margins based on maximum equivalent stress along with
structural results.
No convergence criteria
defined.
No alert criteria defined.
See
Scenario 3 below for supporting details.
The ANSYS DesignSpace CAE
(Computer-Aided Engineering) software program was used in
conjunction with 3D CAD (Computer-Aided Design) solid geometry
to simulate the behavior of mechanical parts under
thermal/structural loading conditions. ANSYS DesignSpace
automated FEA (Finite Element Analysis) technologies from
ANSYS, Inc. to generate the
results listed in this report.
Each scenario presented
below represents one complete engineering simulation. The
definition of a simulation includes known factors about a
design such as material properties per part, contact behavior
between parts (in an assembly), and types and magnitudes of
loading conditions. The results of a simulation provide
insight into how the parts may perform and how the design
might be improved. Multiple scenarios allow comparison of
results given different loading conditions, materials or
geometric configurations.
Convergence and alert
criteria may be defined for any of the results and can serve
as guides for evaluating the quality of calculated results and
the acceptability of values in the context of known design
requirements.
Solution history
provides a means of assessing the quality of results by
examining how values change during successive iterations of
solution refinement.
Convergence criteria sets a specific limit on the
allowable change in a result between iterations. A result
meeting this criteria is said to be "converged".
Alert criteria define
"allowable" ranges for result values. Alert ranges typically
represent known aspects of the design specification.
The discussions below
follow the organization of information in the ANSYS
DesignSpace "Explorer" user interface. Each scenario
corresponds to a unique branch in the Explorer "Outline".
Names emphasized in "double quotes" match preferences
set in the user interface.
All values are presented in
the "Metric (mm, kg, MPa, °C, s)" unit system.
Notice
Do not accept or reject a
design based solely on the data presented in this report.
Evaluate designs by considering this information in
conjunction with experimental test data and the practical
experience of design engineers and analysts. A quality
approach to engineering design usually mandates physical
testing as the final means of validating structural integrity
to a measured precision.
"A" Frame TIS Loading = Real Load * 1.5
= 195t
""A" Frame
TIS Loading = Real Load * 1.5 = 195t"
obtains geometry from the ACIS® part
"A_frame_3.sat".
·
The
bounding box for the model
measures 6,830.0 by 2,945.0 by 250.0 mm along the global x, y
and z axes, respectively.
·
The model weighs a total of
1,795.71 kg.
Table:
Parts
Figure 1
: Geometry
·
"Mesh"(Fig
2) , associated with
""A" Frame TIS Loading = Real Load * 1.5 = 195t"
has an overall relevance of 0.
·
"Mesh" contains 11122 nodes
and 5382 elements.
No mesh controls specified.
Figure 2
: Mesh
Environment
Real Load * 1.5 = 195t
"Environment
Real Load * 1.5 = 195t"(Fig
3) contains all loading conditions defined for
""A" Frame TIS Loading = Real
Load * 1.5 = 195t" in this scenario.
The following tables list
local loads and supports applied to specific geometry.
Structural Loading
Table 2
: Structural Loading
Structural Loads |
Name |
Type |
Magnitude |
Vector |
Reaction Force |
Reaction Vector |
"Fixed Support" |
Surface Displacement |
0.0 mm |
[- x, 0.0 mm y, - z] |
956,442.77 N |
[0.0 N x, 956,442.77 N y, 0.0 N z] |
"Fixed Support 2" |
Surface Displacement |
0.0 mm |
[0.0 mm x, - y, 0.0 mm z] |
5.85×10-3 N |
[-3.54×10-3 N x, 0.0 N y, 4.66×10-3 N z] |
"Force" |
Surface Force |
1.91×106 N |
[0.0 N x, -1.91×106 N y, 0.0 N z] |
N/A |
N/A |
"Fixed Support 3" |
Surface Displacement |
0.0 mm |
[- x, 0.0 mm y, - z] |
956,507.23 N |
[0.0 N x, 956,507.23 N y, 0.0 N z] |
Figure 3:
Environment Real Load * 1.5 = 195t
"Solution"
contains the calculated response for
""A" Frame TIS Loading = Real
Load * 1.5 = 195t" given loading conditions
defined in "Environment
Real Load * 1.5 = 195t".
It was selected that the
program would choose the solver used in this solution.
Table
3:
Structural Results
Values |
Name |
Figure |
Scope |
Orientation |
Minimum |
Maximum |
Alert Criteria |
"Equivalent Stress" |
4 |
""A" Frame TIS Loading = Real Load * 1.5 = 195t" |
Global |
0.93 MPa |
253.06 MPa |
None |
"Total Deformation" |
5 |
""A" Frame TIS Loading = Real Load * 1.5 = 195t" |
Global |
2.09×10-4 mm |
2.89 mm |
None |
"Directional Deformation X" |
6 |
""A" Frame TIS Loading = Real Load * 1.5 = 195t" |
X Axis |
-0.53 mm |
0.53 mm |
None |
"Directional Deformation Y" |
7 |
""A" Frame TIS Loading = Real Load * 1.5 = 195t" |
Y Axis |
-2.89 mm |
0.29 mm |
None |
"Directional Deformation Z" |
8 |
""A" Frame TIS Loading = Real Load * 1.5 = 195t" |
Z Axis |
-0.05 mm |
0.03 mm |
None |
·
Convergence tracking not
enabled.
Figure 4:
"Equivalent Stress" Contours
Figure 5:
"Total Deformation" Contours
Figure 6:
"Directional Deformation X" Contours
Figure 7:"Directional
Deformation Y" Contours
Figure 8:
"Directional Deformation Z" Contours
Equivalent Stress Safety
Table 4:
Stress Limit
Definition |
Name |
Stress Limit |
"Stress Tool" |
Yield strength per material. |
Table
5:
Safety Result
Results |
Name |
Figure |
Scope |
Type |
Minimum |
Alert Criteria |
"Stress Tool" |
9 |
""A" Frame TIS Loading = Real Load * 1.5 = 195t" |
Safety Factor |
0.85 |
None |
·
Convergence tracking not
enabled.
Figure 9:
"Safety Factor" Contours
Frequency Results
Frequency results apply to
all active parts in ""A"
Frame TIS Loading = Real Load * 1.5 = 195t".
Table 6:
Natural Frequencies
First 3 Natural Frequencies |
Name |
Figure |
Mode |
Frequency |
Alert Criteria |
"1st Frequency Mode In Range" |
10 |
1 |
6.66 Hz |
none |
"2nd Frequency Mode In Range" |
11 |
2 |
35.7 Hz |
none |
"3rd Frequency Mode In Range" |
12 |
3 |
50.28 Hz |
none |
·
Convergence tracking not
enabled.
Figure 10:
"1st Frequency Mode In Range" Contours
Figure 11:
"2nd Frequency Mode In Range" Contours
Figure 12:
"3rd Frequency Mode In Range" Contours
“A"
Frame Real Loading 130t"
""A" Frame Real
Loading 130t" obtains geometry
from the ACIS® part
"A_frame_3.sat".
·
The
bounding box for the model measures
6,830.0 by 2,945.0 by 250.0 mm along the global x, y and z
axes, respectively.
·
The model weighs a total of
1,795.71 kg.
Table :
Parts
Figure 13:
Geometry
·
"Mesh"(Fig
14)
, associated with
""A" Frame Real Loading 130t"
has an overall relevance of 0.
·
"Mesh" contains 11122 nodes
and 5382 elements.
No mesh controls specified.
Figure :
Mesh
"Environment
Real Load 130t"(Fig
15) contains all loading conditions defined for
""A" Frame Real Loading 130t"
in this scenario.
The following tables list
local loads and supports applied to specific geometry.
Table :
Structural Loads
Structural Loads |
Name |
Type |
Magnitude |
Vector |
Reaction Force |
Reaction Vector |
"Fixed Support" |
Surface Displacement |
0.0 mm |
[- x, 0.0 mm y, - z] |
637,628.51 N |
[0.0 N x, 637,628.51 N y, 0.0 N z] |
"Fixed Support 2" |
Surface Displacement |
0.0 mm |
[0.0 mm x, - y, 0.0 mm z] |
5.16×10-3 N |
[5.15×10-3 N x, 0.0 N y, -3.23×10-4 N z] |
"Force" |
Surface Force |
1.28×106 N |
[0.0 N x, -1.28×106 N y, 0.0 N z] |
N/A |
N/A |
"Fixed Support 3" |
Surface Displacement |
0.0 mm |
[- x, 0.0 mm y, - z] |
637,671.49 N |
[0.0 N x, 637,671.49 N y, 0.0 N z] |
Figure :
"Environment Real Load 130t"
"Solution"
contains the calculated response for
""A" Frame Real Loading 130t"
given loading conditions defined in
"Environment Real Load 130t".
It was selected that the
program would choose the solver used in this solution.
Table :
Structural Results
Table 4.3.1.1. Values |
Name |
Figure |
Scope |
Orientation |
Minimum |
Maximum |
Alert Criteria |
"Equivalent Stress" |
16 |
""A" Frame Real Loading 130t" |
Global |
0.62 MPa |
168.71 MPa |
None |
"Total Deformation" |
17 |
""A" Frame Real Loading 130t" |
Global |
1.39×10-4 mm |
1.93 mm |
None |
"Directional Deformation X" |
18 |
""A" Frame Real Loading 130t" |
X Axis |
-0.35 mm |
0.35 mm |
None |
"Directional Deformation Y" |
19 |
""A" Frame Real Loading 130t" |
Y Axis |
-1.93 mm |
0.2 mm |
None |
"Directional Deformation Z" |
20 |
""A" Frame Real Loading 130t" |
Z Axis |
-0.03 mm |
0.02 mm |
None |
·
Convergence tracking not
enabled.
Figure 16:
"Equivalent Stress" Contours
Figure 17:
"Total Deformation" Contours
Figure 1:
"Directional Deformation X" Contours
Figure :
"Directional Deformation Y" Contours
Figure :
"Directional Deformation Z" Contours
Equivalent Stress Safety
Table :
Stress Limit
Definition |
Name |
Stress Limit |
"Stress Tool" |
Yield strength per material. |
Table :
Safety Result
Results |
Name |
Figure |
Scope |
Type |
Minimum |
Alert Criteria |
"Stress Tool" |
21 |
""A" Frame Real Loading 130t" |
Safety Factor |
1.27 |
None |
·
Convergence tracking not
enabled.
Figure 21:
"Safety Factor" Contours
Frequency results apply to
all active parts in ""A"
Frame Real Loading 130t".
Table 12:
Natural Frequencies
Table 4.3.3.1. First 3 Natural Frequencies |
Name |
Figure |
Mode |
Frequency |
Alert Criteria |
"1st Frequency Mode In Range" |
22 |
1 |
8.63 Hz |
none |
"2nd Frequency Mode In Range" |
23 |
2 |
35.65 Hz |
none |
"3rd Frequency Mode In Range" |
24 |
3 |
50.99 Hz |
none |
·
Convergence tracking not
enabled.
Figure 22:
"1st Frequency Mode In Range" Contours
Figure 23:
"2nd Frequency Mode In Range" Contours
Figure 24:
"3rd Frequency Mode In Range" Contours
“A" Frame Test Loading 250t
""A" Frame Test
Loading 250t" obtains geometry
from the ACIS® part
""A_frame_3.sat".
·
The
bounding box for the model measures
6,830.0 by 2,945.0 by 250.0 mm along the global x, y and z
axes, respectively.
·
The model weighs a total of
1,795.71 kg.
Table 13:
Parts
Figure 25:
Geometry
·
"Mesh"(Fig
26)
, associated with
""A" Frame Test Loading 250t"
has an overall relevance of 0.
·
"Mesh" contains 11122 nodes
and 5382 elements.
No mesh controls specified.
Figure 26:
Mesh
"Environment
Test Load 250t"(Fig
27)
contains all loading conditions defined for
""A" Frame Test Loading 250t"
in this scenario.
The following tables list
local loads and supports applied to specific geometry.
Table 14:
Structural Loads
Structural Loads |
Name |
Type |
Magnitude |
Vector |
Reaction Force |
Reaction Vector |
"Fixed Support" |
Surface Displacement |
0.0 mm |
[- x, 0.0 mm y, - z] |
1.23×106 N |
[0.0 N x, 1.23×106 N y, 46,280.45 N z] |
"Force" |
Surface Force |
2.45×106 N |
[0.0 N x, -2.45×106 N y, 0.0 N z] |
N/A |
N/A |
"Fixed Support 3" |
Surface Displacement |
0.0 mm |
[- x, 0.0 mm y, - z] |
1.23×106 N |
[0.0 N x, 1.23×106 N y, 50,944.17 N z] |
"Fixed Support 4" |
Surface Displacement |
0.0 mm |
[- x, - y, 0.0 mm z] |
18,452.14 N |
[9,850.29 N x, -15,602.98 N y, 2.11×10-3 N z] |
"Fixed Support 5" |
Surface Displacement |
0.0 mm |
[0.0 mm x, - y, - z] |
14,752.56 N |
[-1.68×10-3 N x, 0.0 N y, 14,752.56 N z] |
Figure 27:
"Environment Test Load 250t”
"Solution"
contains the calculated response for
""A" Frame Test Loading 250t"
given loading conditions defined in
"Environment Test Load 250t".
It was selected that the
program would choose the solver used in this solution.
Table 15:
Structural Results
Values |
Name |
Figure |
Scope |
Orientation |
Minimum |
Maximum |
Alert Criteria |
"Equivalent Stress" |
28 |
""A" Frame Test Loading 250t" |
Global |
7.68×10-2 MPa |
227.05 MPa |
None |
"Total Deformation" |
29 |
""A" Frame Test Loading 250t" |
Global |
2.01×10-5 mm |
3.59 mm |
None |
"Directional Deformation X" |
30 |
""A" Frame Test Loading 250t" |
X Axis |
-0.63 mm |
0.63 mm |
None |
"Directional Deformation Y" |
31 |
""A" Frame Test Loading 250t" |
Y Axis |
-3.59 mm |
0.51 mm |
None |
"Directional Deformation Z" |
32 |
""A" Frame Test Loading 250t" |
Z Axis |
-0.01 mm |
0.07 mm |
None |
·
Convergence tracking not
enabled.
Figure 28:
"Equivalent Stress" Contours
Figure 29:
"Total Deformation" Contours
Figure 30:
"Directional Deformation X" Contours
Figure 31:
"Directional Deformation Y" Contours
Figure 32:
"Directional Deformation Z" Contours
Table 16:
Stress Limit
Definition |
Name |
Stress Limit |
"Stress Tool" |
Yield strength per material. |
Table 17:
Safety Result
Results |
Name |
Figure |
Scope |
Type |
Minimum |
Alert Criteria |
"Stress Tool" |
33 |
""A" Frame Test Loading 250t" |
Safety Factor |
0.95 |
None |
·
Convergence tracking not
enabled.
Figure 33:
"Safety Factor" Contours
The lowest safety factor of
0.85 occurs in the TIS loading scenario, where the max stress
is 253.06 MPa. This is a very localized stress due to the
constraints, and will have no effect in the real loading
situation.
In the real life load case
the safety factor is 1.27, with the max stress being 168.71 MPa,
this being below the yield of the material.
In the case of loading with
250 tons which gives a 0.95 safety factor, with a max stress
of 227.05 MPa, the stress is again very localized due to the
constraints.
In conclusion the frame can
be tested to 250 tons without any damage.
Table :
Material Properties
"Stainless Steel" Properties |
Name |
Type |
Value |
Modulus of Elasticity |
Temperature-Independent |
193,000.0 MPa |
Poisson's Ratio |
Temperature-Independent |
0.31 |
Mass Density |
Temperature-Independent |
7.75×10-6 kg/mm³ |
Coefficient of Thermal Expansion |
Temperature-Independent |
1.36×10-5 1/°C |
Thermal Conductivity |
Temperature-Independent |
0.02 W/mm·°C |
Specific Heat |
Temperature-Independent |
480.0 J/kg·°C |
Table :
Stress Limits
"Stainless Steel" Stress Limits |
Name |
Type |
Value |
Tensile Yield Strength |
Temperature-Independent |
215.0 MPa |
Tensile Ultimate Strength |
Temperature-Independent |
586.0 MPa |
Compressive Yield Strength |
Temperature-Independent |
215.0 MPa |
Compressive Ultimate Strength |
Temperature-Independent |
0.0 MPa |
Table :
Thermal Conductivity vs. Temperature
|